Wednesday, January 20, 2016

Evidentiary Hearing

Evidentiary Hearing
 
By: Dr. Peter A. Barone, Esq.
When there are questions regarding the admissibility of various items of evidence into a criminal proceeding and criminal trials the attorneys file motions before the court so they can have an Evidentiary Hearing for the judge to make the determination as to whether or not the items being presented for admission as evidence meet the requirements for admissibility.  This happens a great deal when one of the parties is trying to claim a privilege.
Not everyone is aware of what an evidentiary hearing is or when it is used or may occur. There  are many law enforcement officials who are somewhat confused as to the use of an evidentiary hearing in a criminal case. When using the term evidentiary hearing is a term that is used to describe a proceeding where evidence, such as witness or expert testimony and documentation is presented to the court in order to reach a decision on a particular matter. These hearings generally take place prior to trial. Now during these hearings information and evidence is presented to demonstrate if the item at issue being presented to the court for admission is admissible under the rule of evidence.

There are certain requirements that must be met prior to the court's scheduling of an evidentiary hearing. When scheduling an evidentiary hearing the defendant the defendant is required to and must establish his or her right to actually having an evidentiary hearing. This occurs when a defendant's motion and the government’s response to such motion establish a dispute as to material facts. To accomplish this a competent criminal defense attorney will need to allege specific and detailed facts to make the court aware of disputed issues of fact that must be resolved during a evidentiary hearing.  Regarding an evidentiary hearing it is popular to make general assertions of alleged constitutional violations; however, this will not compel a court to conduct an evidentiary hearing and the prosecutor will challenge motions by the defense alleging constitutional violations.

Looking at an evidentiary hearing from the standpoint of formulating defense strategy a pretrial motion and evidentiary hearings can be a valuable tool. The reason for this is that a pretrial suppression motion requiring an evidentiary hearing typically will lead to the disclosure of additional discovery earlier than usual. This discovery can be invaluable for trial preparation. It actually gives the defense an additional bite of the apple and the chance to see all of the evidence and also seeing how each witness testifies under the pressure of cross-examination. To examine this actual action it is technically an evidentiary hearing anytime a court hears and considers evidence to make a legal decision.  This can actually occurs in many different contexts, including a motion for belated appeal, hearing on a motion for ineffective counsel (Klotter, 2000).  
An evidentiary hearing in criminal cases is most commonly referring to a hearing that occurs as part of a violation of probation case.  When someone charged with a violation of probation and does not resolve the case with an admission or dismissal of the violation of probation, the case will ultimately resolves with an evidentiary hearing.  An evidentiary hearing is the equivalent of a trial for a law violation and the defendant does not have all of the same rights that they would in a normal trial. During the evidentiary hearing, the State Attorney’s Office will call witnesses and present evidence attempting to prove the probationer violated their probation.  The Accused will also have the opportunity to call witnesses, present evidence and present argument.  
There are actually two (2) types of violation of probations and they are technical violations and substantive violations.  An evidentiary hearing can occur on either a technical or substantive violation. The State is forced to prove the violation by a preponderance of evidence which is less than what is required in an appeal or a family law trial being clear and convincing evidence and much less than what is required in a criminal trial which is beyond and to the exclusion of a reasonable doubt. Generally, the majority of evidentiary hearings concern a probationer’s ability to pay the many, many costs associated with probation (Klotter, 2000). 
                                                        Reference
Klotter, J.C, (2000). Criminal Evidence 7th Ed. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing.